Comments
The writer was originally going to make the akatsuki a group of demons/monsters. You can tell from their features and abilities. Like deidara having mouthes on his hands or sasori's 1st puppet body having a mechanical scorpion tail. It's why they seem so outlandish.
Tsunade is the only woman who really is important throughout the series. Sakura will go on to do some important things. Granny Chiyo was pretty important although she was only around for 1 arc. But yea female characters were underused for the potential they had. The creator of the series admitted he didn't know how write female characters well.
Then, Kishimoto is just another man among the many who can't comprehend women.
Or... perhaps it is just the fact that he's being more-so of a gentleman, in keeping a woman from doing something stupid. That's how chivalry is objective defined, without a second "perspective". Chivalry is defined: "To keep the smart from doing something dumb."
Therefore, if a woman wants to do the exact same things of a man, in terms of his brutal and cruel nature, she is going to neglect her intelligence. The human, not under control of their free will, will focus on their body, thus becoming stupid. If the brain's intelligence is mastered, then the body will become a "second nature" for a human to present no effort in maintaining its function. This would make a woman objectively beautiful, because she has mastered intelligence, and thus presents to a man a challenge for him to conquer.
This is to say that when a woman wants control over her body, she is losing her free will and control over her mind. The human brain is incapable of having two primary focuses, thus relating the body to a machine. The computer is able to multi-task, but the brain is not. Instead, the brain is capable of having a primary and a secondary focus. The primary focus SHOULD be itself, while the secondary focus SHOULD be the body. This is how freedom is defined. So... what is a woman's objective in being "useful" if only to lose control of her mind, so someone else replaces her free will, her freedom, and her intelligence?
Or... perhaps it is just the fact that he's being more-so of a gentleman, in keeping a woman from doing something stupid. That's how chivalry is objective defined, without a second "perspective". Chivalry is defined: "To keep the smart from doing something dumb."
Therefore, if a woman wants to do the exact same things of a man, in terms of his brutal and cruel nature, she is going to neglect her intelligence. The human, not under control of their free will, will focus on their body, thus becoming stupid. If the brain's intelligence is mastered, then the body will become a "second nature" for a human to present no effort in maintaining its function. This would make a woman objectively beautiful, because she has mastered intelligence, and thus presents to a man a challenge for him to conquer.
This is to say that when a woman wants control over her body, she is losing her free will and control over her mind. The human brain is incapable of having two primary focuses, thus relating the body to a machine. The computer is able to multi-task, but the brain is not. Instead, the brain is capable of having a primary and a secondary focus. The primary focus SHOULD be itself, while the secondary focus SHOULD be the body. This is how freedom is defined. So... what is a woman's objective in being "useful" if only to lose control of her mind, so someone else replaces her free will, her freedom, and her intelligence?
- Log in or register to post comments
Permalink